Following on from my post on the Amero I came across this article which explores the fallout for the $ from the current financial crisis. The hard question the Chinese, Russians, Arabs and other holders of $ must be asking themselves is what to do with them.

Well I think we’ve been seeing the answer in action for some time now. Buy overseas assets not paper. In other words buy into industries, land, property but not continue to finance the US deficit by buying US treasury stock.

We’re starting to see the Arabs and Chinese buying up assets in many sectors, especially finance and resources. Makes sense doesn’t it?

Nothing confirms this more than the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority buying 5% of Citbank for $7.5bln…….structured as a convertible loan paying 11%….now that is a junk rate.

What a deal for the Arabs. And the irony of having to bail out a huge US financial behemoth.

No doubt there has been plenty of sucking wind going on in Washington and Wall Street.

It’s a simple game from here on in. It’s called “Show me the Money”.

Another sensible policy proposal out of Wellington. I blame the weather myself. The sunshine must be sending rays of optimism and clarity of thought into the capitals’ thinking tanks.

First it was Arthur Grimes from Motu and now Adolf Stroombergen from Infometrics. Adolf raises the idea of a flat tax and a guaranteed minimum income (GMI). The concept of a GMI has been around for a long time but it’s good to see it mentioned alongside tax reform.

Last year Charles Murray, co-author of the Bell Curve, came out with a similar proposal based on a basic income and dismantling of the welfare state. There has been plenty of commentary around “In Our Hands” but it is a sign that policy analysts are starting to realise that our current fiscal arrangements are sorely in need of attention.

Coupled with the fact that monetarism is dead in the water it leads me to believe that we are on the cusp of a major evolution in our economic structures. Also it should be noted that none of these proposals are original in thought although perhaps in detail.

Students of financial history will know that many good ideas have fallen by the wayside or been ignored but eventually they will come to the fore. We have a land tax proposed, GST reform, income tax lowered or abolished and a universal income. Well hey now things are starting to come together.

What we need now is serious analysis into these types of proposals. Anyone interested?

At last an article which pans reverse mortgages. I’ve never been a fan of these instruments which are really another form of credit card debt but with a supposedly safe pay off at the end.

They are a brokers favourite with the usual trailing commissions compounding along. It’s another sub prime fiasco waiting to kick in as people realise their wealth has been eaten up and they now have nothing.

There are other ways of raising cash which include trading down or borrowing from family members with the property as security.

Avoid these schemes like the plague.

Dave Wetzel, Vice-Chair of Transport for London, writes an interesting paper focusing on the issues of transport infrastructure and increases in surrounding land values. The issue of land and its possible taxation reared its head recently here in NZ but has since had little media interest.

However, its time we really focused on land and its value within the economic system. One of the examples Dave looks at is the building of the Jubilee Line Extension back in the 1990s. It was a marvelous piece of engineering and brought new and convenient transport options to many Londoners.

It also brought wealth to people who owned land and property in and around the areas where new stations were sited. He quotes Don Riley, a London property developer, who calculated,

“..these land values alone, have increased by a staggering STG13bln when the construction of the line itself was only STG3.5bln.”

So this wealth has been gained for no effort (well there is always effort in speculation) and represents a windfall gain. So why shouldn’t some of that have been used to actually fund the line itself.  Dave uses this example to develop an argument for a Land Value Tax as a way of funding public infrastructure.

We don’t need PPPs when projects can be funded out of future wealth gains. This is a subject which gets little attention but deserves much more.

With the meltdown in the US $ has come a raft of stories about the end of the greenback as we know it. Messrs Chavez and Ahmadinejad have been whooping it up at the recent OPEC summit and gloating over the demise of the $ etc etc. Well not everyone agrees with their opinion on the matter but clearly the $ has had a major kicking and there are now other options on the table for currency reserves such as the Euro and now more than ever the Yuan though it’s not fully convertible.

Already some well known investors such as Jim Rogers are looking elsewhere to put their money. Last year he called the US recession and the $ decline. Interestingly he saw the Euro as disappearing within 15-20 years as it was a “political currency”. I never though it would last 10 years so it’s done well. He also recently said he would like to put all his money into Yuan…wouldn’t we all?

But there has also been plenty of chatter about new currency unions….Asian? or what about a NAFTA based system?

It’s called the Amero, a union between the US, Canada and Mexico.  It’s an interesting project, overrun with innuendo and conspiracy theories. As Jim Rogers says political currency unions never last (the same goes for free trade agreements).

Whatever the merits of the Amero, it’s clear that the geo-currency axis is shifting to incorporate more players. It could make for some interesting times ahead in the global currency markets.

Believe it or not Northern Rock is still up for sale. It’s hard to imagine it has any value in it though like Barings there is a chance of life after death. The real concern though is the financial responsibility assumed by the taxpayer. As previously reported the taxpayer has underwritten Northern Rock and by inference the entire banking system.

This week concerns have arisen that the taxpayer could actually be seriously under water from this guarantee. Cracks are appearing in the government establishment with the Bank of England under fire from the Treasury and the knives are being sharpened as the blame game starts.

The UK financial system is clearly still in trouble.