Currency Intervention: Next on the Fed’s Agenda

With the Dow already 250 points off the recent bounce and the $ hitting new lows against the Yen, Sfr and Euro, the time has come for the Fed to look at the $. Today even the President was moved to make some comments about strong dollar policy and importing energy inflation through a weak dollar.

The problem the Fed has is that the $ could really collapse here. $Yen is current at 101.15, a 13 year low give or take. That was when I was actually quoting the currency pair myself. Actually it has been down at these levels a few times but briefly. For the Japanese this is not helpful at all with exporters penciling in 113 for 2008. But the psychological effect of the $ breaking 100 against the Yen and 1.00 against the Sfr may well bring some serious fallout. The $ may well be booted into oblivion by all those on currency pegs to the $ who are certainly wondering whether or not to abandon them.

The question is whether intervention would do any good. Well it might and that may be all that is needed. There isn’t any good news for the US right now but then again its been one way traffic for 6 months now and for most of the last few years for the $. Is there any good reason to see it lower other than a complete disengagement by the market of the $.

The knock on effect in all markets could send the whole US financial system over the edge. A quick 5% appreciation in the $ against the majors as well as Aus, Cad and Nz would certainly help take the edge off the current situation. It may not save the $ in the long run but it would buy some breathing space over the next few months.

Will they do it? Well if they don’t you’d better hold on to your hats as carry trades get unwound.

Man the Pumps: Central Banks run up the white flag

With rumours continuing to circle around main street financial institutions in trouble, the Fed along with other central banks piled in another $200bln worth of liquidity in a vain hope to stem the tide. It certainly worked sparking a massive rally in the US market which was looking very weak indeed.

I wrote 6 weeks ago that the Fed would have no option other than to underwrite the whole financial system. This is exactly what they are doing. The worrying aspect of this approach is that it leads the market to depend on continuing liquidity to provide confidence and prevent what would be happening without intervention, namely a full scale rout with several institutions going under.

This creates extreme moral hazard. Even though many financial institutions have clearly acted irresponsibly and in some cases in other ways, they will not be allowed to fail unless a “deal” is worked out where they will be “acquired” quietly for a nominal sum and so the system stays solidly in place and the illusion is maintained.

F.William Engdahl lays out his thoughts on the origins of this mess. It’s focus is the US over the last 100 years and is interesting to read though he makes some strong accusations about the actions of certain people.  The extent to which small cliques have organised and run the financial system is open to questions but there is no doubt that the US prevailed at Bretton Woods on the strength of pure self-interest.

So what now? Well I would say more of the same. But gravity is a powerful force and its hard to imagine these markets not falling further and more de-leveraging taking place in credit and carry trades. I’ll discuss shortly what a new global currency system might look like because the current one is about to explode.

Teenage Pregnancy: Incentives to avoid being knocked up

From the Rt Hon Balneus comes an interesting proposition to reduce teenage pregnancies: simply offer a cash incentive for not getting pregnant.

This came about from a post about population reduction being the answer to reducing carbon emissions. As i noted in my previous post population growth, especially in developing countries, is putting severe pressure on all resources.

China has been on to this well in advance with its one child per couple policy.  For developed countries teenage pregnancies have been a bit of a problem and something that has not been adequately addressed. This idea fits in neatly with the premise of the “Logic of Life” by Tim Harford.

Tim notes that people make complicated  calculations about potential trade offs every day whether its to have unprotected sex or park illegally. He argues cogently that we do respond to incentives and change behaviour when the pay offs look in our favour.

For example he notes research which showed juvenile crime lower or falling in US states where the age for adult criminality was lower than in states where it was higher. The reason was simple: the payoffs were worse for juvenile criminals in states where they would be tried in the adult system. Juveniles were simply responding to the market.

So for teenage pregnancies it is a similar story. Where welfare benefits are good for both mother and baby, there is no disincentive to get pregnant. So the payoffs for riskier behaviour are ok. That’s because as a society we value the rights of the baby and choose to provide for it regardless of how it arrived.

Now imagine we said to all teenage girls that for every year until a certain age (whether 18 or 21) they would receive $200 in a savings account for not getting pregnant. That would be an interesting idea to model.

Now I am sure there are many pros and cons to this but I like the idea of policymaking taking into account how people behave rather than what officials deem to be a good or right thing to do.

Agflation: Feeding the world

I’ve mentioned Agflation previously and we’re starting to see more concern expressed at the official level. The UK Government’s Chief Scientific Adviser, Professor John Beddington, has weighed into the debate calling food shortages a problem that was as immediate as climate change. The driver of agflation is two fold: increased demand driven by population growth and increasing development and supply shortages caused by deforestation to grow biofuels.

These two drivers are causing major price rises in all food groups. This creates what might be called “real” inflation, a price rise in the cost of real goods as opposed to asset inflation which is more of a monetary phenomenon.

This is a real problem because it can’t be solved by the hammer of monetary policy though the myopists in their central bank ivory towers seem to think so.

I can imagine their conversation: “let’s raise interest rates so people eat less”.

In many countries people are exhorted to have more children especially in developed economies where birth rates among the middle classes have fallen. So how can we stop the population expanding and how are we going to feed all these people and do it in a manner than the ecosystem can cope with.

It’s a tricky question. One could argue that food shortages, famine, disease and natural disasters regulate populations. That may still be the case. But can we rely on that and should we given we are more enlightened, well supposedly.

Population growth was for a long time a favourite topic for policymakers but has only recently come back onto the mainstream agenda. There is no doubt that the growth in biofuels has played a major part in this and that governments who have set targets for biofuel supply may well need to go back and think more carefully about how the unintended consequences of this feel good policy will play out.

Money’s too tight to mention

As the credit crunch continues to spreads its woes my inbox is filling up with offers from NZ banks (all Australian owned by the way) to buy various types of debt with fabulous names:

- Perpetual non-cumulative preference shares

- Perpetual callable sub-ordinated bonds

All offering north of 10%. A no brainer for bank debt surely?

Well yes it is. Let’s face it if the bank goes belly up we’re all stuffed. How much is deposit insurance worth these days? Probably not much. But the reason behind this rush of issuance is more interesting.

Banks have plenty of cash on the books, known to us as our deposits, but recorded as unsecured liabilities in the bank’s balance sheet. Yes we are not really depositors but merely unsecured creditors.

So why do banks need to raise more debt or more to the point equity dressed up as debt? Well their balance sheets are under severe pressure and they need to meet the requirements laid out in Basel II which means they need more equity on the balance sheet in order to lend out all this cash.

This is not good news at all. It means banks are constantly trying to tidy up their financial position which is tenuous at best.

In the US mortgage backed bonds, normally AAA, are trading at their widest against US treasuries since 1986. There is some serious de-leveraging going on even in the most liquid and traditionally safe markets. This is a harbinger of further losses to come. Many players are now starting to realise that the financial system is in structural distress.

Suddenly owning a few dairy cows seems like a sensible investment.

Municipal Bonds: The Rating Game

Local cities and states have finally woken up to the way in which they are systematically fleeced by the rating agencies. Bill Lockye, the Californian Treasurer, is leading a campaign to change the way in which their bonds are rated.

Often they are rated poorly which then requires a nice fat insurance payment on top. This simply transfers more taxpayer funds to the financial sector.

Ok so it’s just another racket but what I like about this is the awakening from local financial institutions and the realisation that they can do things a bit differently.

What is to stop local governments from issuing their own bonds to their own people for local projects? Take that a step further and what’s to stop them from issuing their own local currency.

The current crisis is helping many people to see through some of the smoke and mirror charges imposed in the course of financial transactions and the system is becoming more transparent as “special purpose” structures and entities are revealed to be nothing more than methods to add on commissions and fees as many times as possible.